Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 378 F.2d 279 - Rosa Continente, D/B/A G. Continente v. John A. Continente

Rosa Continente, D/B/A G. Continente v. John A. Continente’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
April 2004
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently April 2004

5 federal appellate · 3 district ·

7019671970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dawn Donut Co. v. Hart's Food Stores, Inc. · Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co. · John R. Thompson Co. v. Holloway · Fairway Foods, Inc., a Corporation v. Fairway Markets, Inc., and Raisin Markets, Inc. · Plough, Inc. v. Kreis Laboratories

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “if the use of the marks by the registrant and the unauthorized user are confined to two sufficiently distinct and geographically separate markets, with no likelihood that the registrant will expand his use into defendant’s market, so that no public confusion is possible, then the registrant is not entitled to enjoin the junior user’s use of the mark.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.