Juvera v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
378 F.2d 433 · 1967
Citation profile
37 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Glasser v. United States · Hem v. United States · United States v. Virgil D. Dardi, Robert B. Gravis, Charles Rosenthal and Charles Berman · Hernandez v. United States · Rodella v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is argued that it was essential that the trial judge at the commencement of the trial discuss with the defendants the problems relating to representation of the several defendants by one counsel, pointing out to them the disadvantage that might arise should there be conflicting interests to be represented by the attorney. We find this contention without merit for the reasons recently noted by us in Lugo v. United States, 9 Cir., 350 F.2d 858 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Kruchten v. Eyman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.