Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

378 F.2d 439

Docket No. 11151.

Vaughan v. Gardner

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued May 30, 1967. Decided May 31, 1967.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1967-05-31

2 counsel of record

Relies on Thomas v. Celebrezze · Underwood v. Ribicoff · Poston v. Caraker

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1967-05-31

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently March 2016

2 federal appellate ·

30196719701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Franklin W. Kern, Charleston, W. Va., for appellant.

Charles M. Love, III, Asst. U.S. Atty. (Milton J. Ferguson, U.S. Atty., and W. Warren Upton, Asst. U.S. Atty., on brief), for appellee.

Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and SOBELOFF and WINTER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

The Secretary, on an extensive record, denied claimant's application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits under 216(i) and 223 of the Social Security Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. 416(i) and 423. The district judge affirmed the Secretary's determination.

¶2

We have reviewed the record and, giving full effect to the elements of proof relevant to consideration of a case of this type, Underwood v. Ribicoff, 298 F.2d 850 (4 Cir. 1962), and Thomas v. Celebrezze, 331 F.2d 541 (4 Cir. 1963), we are satisfied that the Secretary's determination has ample evidentiary support.

The judgment of the district court is

¶3

Affirmed.

/378/f2d/439 · .json · Public domain