Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 378 F.2d 761 - Harry C. Knowles v. Clarence T. Gladden, Warden, Oregon State Penitentiary

Harry C. Knowles v. Clarence T. Gladden, Warden, Oregon State Penitentiary’s Empirical Analysis

378 F.2d 761 · 1967

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
October 1992
most recently cited

24 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 1992 · most notably Harris v. Nelson (1969), Gordon Lee Wilkins v. Donald R. Erickson, Warden (1974)

24 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

2101967197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kercheval v. United States · International Ass'n of Machinists v. Duckworth · Andrews v. United States · United States v. Wight · David Busby v. William C. Holman, Warden, Kilby Prison

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(T)he district court found specifically that appellant's guilty plea was made voluntarily and with full understanding of the consequences. We cannot set aside this finding unless it is clearly erroneous. F.R.Civ.P. 52(a). On this record there is substantial evidence that appellant entered the plea voluntarily. He did so only after consultation with, and upon the advice of, competent counsel.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.