Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

378 F.2d 898

Docket No. 24208.

Phillips v. Dutton

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1967-06-15

2 counsel of record

Relies on United Gas Improvement Co. v. Continental Oil Co. · Williams v. Beto · Post v. Boles

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1967-06-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently November 2020

7 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

501967197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Thomas F. Walsh, Savannah, Ga., for appellant.

Mathew Robins, Asst. Atty. Gen., Atlanta, Ga., Arthur K. Bolton, Atty. Gen., G. Ernest Tidwell, Executive Asst. Atty. Gen., Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.

Before COLEMAN and AINSWORTH, Circuit Judges, and CARSWELL, District judge.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Appellant was convicted in the Fulton County, Georgia, Superior Court of larceny from the house and sentenced on March 8, 1960 to a term of eight years. On August 4, 1960, he left the penitentiary and was not returned until December 2, 1965. Prior to filing the present petition, a similar petition for habeas corpus was filed in the Reidsville, Georgia, City Court and denied. He testified that on August 4, 1960, while then serving his sentence, he was sent to the Battey State Hospital, Prison Branch, in Rome, Georgia, and was told by the Warden that he was released. The official records of the Georgia State Prison, testified to by Charles R. Balkcom, show that he escaped from incarceration on that date and was not returnedn until December 2, 1965 when custody was secured from the Florida State Prison where he had most recently been serving a five-year sentence. The Georgia prison records disclose no evidence of a release such as appellant asserts.

¶2

Appellant contends that having been sentenced on March 8, 1960 to eight years' imprisonment, his normal release date would be March 1968 and under allowances for statutory good time he is now eligible for release. However, he has not carried the burden of proving his allegations by a preponderance of the evidence (see Williams v. Beto, 5 Cir., 1965, 354 F.2d 698), nor are we convinced that the findings of the district court on conflicting evidence should be disturbed since they are not clearly erroneous. In fact, we agree with them. See Post v. Boles, 4 Cir., 1964, 332 F.2d 738, cert. den. 380 U.S. 981, 85 S.Ct. 1346, 14 L.Ed.2d 274 (1965).

¶3

We hold, therefore, that the writ was properly denied because appellant's Georgia state sentence was tolled by his escape and the time of his imprisonment did not again begin to run until his return to the Georgia State Prison on December 2, 1965. Obviously, he has not yet served his eight-year sentence.

¶4

Affirmed.

/378/f2d/898 · .json · Public domain