United States v. Chen’s Empirical Analysis
378 F.3d 151 · 2004
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3237 · 18 U.S.C. § 891 · 18 U.S.C. § 892 · 18 U.S.C. § 894
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · United States v. Torres · United States v. Cabrales · United States v. Walsh · United States v. Natale
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A bill of particulars should be required only where the charges of the indictment are so general that they do not advise the defendant of the specific acts of which he is accused.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A] bill of particulars is not necessary where the government has made sufficient disclosures concerning its evidence and witnesses by other means.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“bill of particulars specifying the exact time and place of each alleged act associated with each offense identified in the indictment”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.