Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 378 F.3d 35 - United States v. McLaughlin

United States v. McLaughlin’s Empirical Analysis

378 F.3d 35 · 2004

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
August 2024
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently August 2024

15 federal appellate · 3 district ·

160200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Buford v. United States · United States v. Sklar · United States v. Scroggins · United States v. Royer · United States v. Bradley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “inquiry into whether a defendant has accepted responsibility is typically a fact-dominated enterprise, and we ordinarily review the sentencing court's determination of such an issue for clear error”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a defendant's failure to comply with conditions of a bond [can] be highly relevant to assessing the sincerity of the defendant's contrition.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.