Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 378 F.3d 361 - Camara v. Ashcroft

Camara v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis

378 F.3d 361 · 2004

Citation profile

421
cited by 421 later decisions
July 2023
most recently cited

48 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 421 later decisions — most recently July 2023 · most notably Yi Wu Zhang v. Gonzales (2005), Li Fang Lin v. Mukasey (2008)

48 federal appellate ·

2850200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 6 U.S.C. § 291 · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-Zacarias · Ramsameachire v. Ashcroft · Navaratwam Kamalthas v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Zubeda v. Ashcroft · Rusu v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 421 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “because of persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “are conclusive unless any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude to the contrary.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “independent evidence, taken together, provided strong circumstantial evidence that Camara was imprisoned for political expression in opposition to the ruling government,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.