Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 378 F.3d 610 - Patel v. Ashcroft

Patel v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis

378 F.3d 610 · 2004

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
September 2014
most recently cited

8 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Mendoza-Lopez · Roldan v. Racette · Francisco Lara v. Em Trominski Janet Reno US Francisco Lara-Resendez · Mazen al Najjar v. John Ashcroft Doris Meisner · Mendez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “additional legal arguments, a change of law, or an argument that was overlooked”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.