Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 378 F.3d 632 - Bronisz v. Ashcroft

Bronisz v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis

378 F.3d 632 · 2004

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
2
states following
October 2022
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently October 2022 · most notably Bonilla v. Lynch (2016), Panjwani v. Gonzales (2005)

13 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

210200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Stone v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Gary Laguerre v. Janet Reno, Jose, Martin Avelar-Cruz v. Janet Reno · Alexis Anin v. Janet Reno Attorney General of the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service · McCormick v. City of Chicago · Stewart v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he grant of a motion to reopen vacates the previous order of deportation or removal and reinstates the previously terminated immigration proceedings.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “any discretionary decision under section 212(c), 212(h), 212(i), 244, or 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (as in effect as of the date of the enactment of the [INA] ).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “of her initial immigration proceedings simply ignores the fact that the November 2002 order affirming the denial of her suspension of deportation and voluntary departure, and ordering her deported pursuant to the order to show cause served on her in 1991, is a”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.