Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 378 F.3d 71 - United States v. Cianci

United States v. Cianci’s Empirical Analysis

378 F.3d 71 · 2004

Citation profile

78
cited by 78 later decisions
4
states following
September 2024
most recently cited

40 federal appellate · 18 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 78 later decisions — most recently September 2024 · most notably United States v. Hammoud (2004), United States v. Vega Molina (2005)

40 federal appellate · 18 district · 4 state decisions

410200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blakely v. Washington · Burks v. United States · Johnson v. United States · Sedima Sprl v. Imrex Company Inc · Hamling v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “unlawful for any person employed by or associated with any enterprise engaged in, or the activities of which affect, interstate or foreign commerce, to conduct or participate, directly or indirectly, in the conduct of such enterprise's affairs through a pattern of racketeering activity . . . .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “evidence relating to those [predicate] acts that were found 'unproven' by the jury [with respective to substantive RICO charges] was still available to the jury in its evaluation of the overall RICO charge.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “a declaration ... must mirror a state of mind, which, in light of all the circumstances, including proximity in time, is reasonably likely to have been the same condition existing at the material time.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.