Chun He Li v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis
378 F.3d 959 · 2004
Citation profile
29 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 689 later decisions — most recently September 2021 · most notably Singh v. Gonzales (2006), Husyev v. Mukasey (2008)
29 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-Zacarias · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-Fonseca · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Ventura · Shobna Chandar Lata v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 689 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[m]y [colleague] and I differ on what is the appropriate appellate function. He would retry. I am content to review.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“to view statements given during airport interviews as valuable impeachment sources because of the conditions under which they are taken and because a newly-arriving alien cannot be expected to divulge every detail of the persecution he or she sustained.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Liu v. Holder“affirmatively denied any mistreatment by the Chinese Government . . . and explained that he left China for financial reasons.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Liu v. Holder
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.