Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

378 F. App'x 371

White v. Francis

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided May 17, 2010

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2010-05-17

Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics

Decided 2010-05-17

¶1*372Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

¶2Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

¶3Walter Duane White appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny White’s motion to appoint counsel and add a Defendant and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. White v. Francis, No. 2:07-cv-00015-REM-JES, 2009 WL 302310 (N.D.W.Va. Feb. 5, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶4AFFIRMED.

/378/fappx/371 · .json · Public domain