Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 378 F. Supp. 2d 348 - Allocco Recycling, Ltd. v. Doherty

378 F. Supp. 2d 348 - Allocco Recycling, Ltd. v. Doherty’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
July 2017
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Mathews v. Eldridge · Warth v. Seldin · Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “when an agency has substantial discretion under state or local law to grant or deny a license or permit, the plaintiff has no legitimate claim of entitlement”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.