378 F. Supp. 2d 861 - Jacobs v. Bremner’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 80A · 15 U.S.C. § 80A · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1367
Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment · Hishon v. King & Spalding · Cort v. Ash · Alexander v. Sandoval
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“by a security holder of such registered investment company on behalf of such company,” some courts have read that language as referring to derivative actions — or even as limiting the availability of relief under Section 36(b) to derivative actions alone [citing Mutchka ]. Such a limited reading might perhaps cut Jacobs’ Section 36(b) claim off at the pass. But our Court of Appeals has said that even though the statutory text does not appear to permit direct claims, the determination of what constitutes a claim”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Stegall v. Ladner
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.