378 Ill. App. 3d 1010 - People v. Davison’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
May 2010
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jarecki v. G. D. Searle & Co. · 214 Ill. 2d 206 - People v. Collins · 168 Ill. 2d 107 - People v. Arna · 172 Ill. 2d 452 - People v. Robinson · 168 Ill. 2d 367 - People v. Jones
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Where sentences are mandatorily consecutive and the defendant is sentenced to concurrent sentences, the sentences are void and the remedy is to remand for imposition of consecutive sentences. [Citation.] When a trial court’s decision to impose concurrent prison terms is deemed void, the appellate court has the authority to correct the sentence and the appellate court is not barred from doing so by supreme court rules limiting the State’s right to appeal or prohibiting the appellate court from increasing a defendant’s sentence. [Citation.] Thus, we can, if we so desire, remand simply for the trial court to amend its sentencing order to make sentences already given consecutive. [Citation.]” People v. Davison, 378 Ill. App. 3d 1010, 1018 , 883 N.E.2d 648, 655 (2008), rev’d on other grounds, 233 Ill. 2d 30 , 906 N.E.2d 545 (2009).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a sentence not conforming to a statutory requirement is void and may be corrected at any time.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.