Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 378 N.J. Super. 355 - State v. Ramirez

378 N.J. Super. 355 - State v. Ramirez’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
July 2016
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Peace · 122 N.J. Super. 177 - State v. Hyers · 329 N.J. Super. 265 - State v. Mercado · 361 N.J. Super. 388 - State v. Clayton · State v. de la Hoya

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a starting point when determining whether to grant a remission and, if so, the amount to remit.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “1. Whether the surety has made a reasonable effort under the circumstances to effect the recapture of the fugitive defendant. 2. Whether the applicant is a commercial bondsman. 3. The surety's supervision of the defendant while he or she was released on bail. 4. The length of time the defendant is a fugitive. 5. The prejudice to the State, and the expense incurred by the State, as a result of the fugitive's nonappearance, recapture and enforcement of the forfeiture. 6. Whether the reimbursement of the State's expenses will adequately satisfy the interests of justice. The detriment to the State also includes the intangible element of injury to the public interest where a defendant deliberately fails to make an appearance in a criminal case. 7. The defendant's commission of another crime while a fugitive. 8. The amount of the posted bail. In determining the amount of a partial remission, the court should take into account not only an appropriate percentage of the bail but also its amount. [Citations omitted.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “1. The necessity of providing an incentive to the surety to take active and reasonable steps to recapture a fugitive defendant. 2. The fact that if remission were unreasonably withheld, corporate sureties might be overcautious in their willingness to post bail, resulting in an impairment of an accused's constitutional right to pretrial bail.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.