Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 378 NW2D 134 - Broughton v. Maes

Broughton v. Maes’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently April 2019

4 state decisions

201985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Basso v. Miller · Sargent v. Ross · Ponticas v. K.M.S. Investments · Young v. Garwacki · Stephens v. Stearns

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]here a landlord has information which would lead a reasonably prudent owner exercising due care to suspect that danger exists on the leased premises at the time the tenant takes possession, and that the tenant exercising due care would not discover it for himself, then he must at least disclose such information to the tenant. * * * “To require one to use that care which an ordinarily prudent person would exercise under the same or similar circumstances can hardly be onerous, unreasonable or oppressive.” (quoting the trial court memorandum)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[W]here a landlord has information which would lead a reasonably prudent owner exercising due care to suspect that danger exists on the leased premises at the time the tenant takes possession, and that the tenant exercising due care would not discover it for himself, then he must at least disclose such information to the tenant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.