Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 378 Pa. 609 - Schnabel v. Meredith

Schnabel v. Meredith’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

63
cited by 63 later decisions
4
cited 4 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
February 2016
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 63 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2016 · most notably Rosenbloom v. Metromedia, Inc. (1971), Time, Inc. v. Hill (1967)

6 federal appellate · 35 state decisions

1601954196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sidis v. FR Pub. Corporation · Waring v. WDAS Broadcasting Station, Inc. · Collins v. Dispatch Publishing Co. · Leverton v. Curtis Pub. Co. · Kilian v. Doubleday & Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * one who unwillingly comes into the public eye because of his own fault, as in the case of a criminal, is subject to the same limitations upon his right to be let alone. Community custom achieves the same result with reference to one unjustly charged with crime or the subject of a striking catastrophe. Both groups of persons are the objects of legitimate public interest during a period of time after their conduct or misfortune has brought them to the public attention; until they have reverted to the lawful and unexciting life led, by the great, bulk of the community, they are subject to the privileges which publishers have to satisfy the curiosity of the public as to their leaders, heroes, villians and victims.” (Emphasis supplied.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.