Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 378 S.C. 476 - State v. Page

State v. Page’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

24 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Bruton v. United States · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Richardson v. Marsh · United States v. Hasting · United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. W&O, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is firmly established that otherwise inadmissible evidence may be properly admitted when opposing counsel opens the door to that evidence.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The introduction of a nontestifying co-defendant’s statement which implicates a defendant violates a defendant's right to confrontation because no opportunity to cross-examine the co-defendant is presented. Because the right to confrontation is so fundamental, limiting instructions are not an adequate substitute.”) (citations omitted). 12 . Interestingly, Appellants state in their reply brief that they”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Whether a person opens the door to the admission of otherwise inadmissible evidence during the course of a trial is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial judge.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.