Shumpert v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
November 2016
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Anders v. California · McDonald v. Pless · Cherry v. State · Caprood v. State · Pierce v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“juror testimony involving internal misconduct may be received [] when necessary to ensure fundamental fairness.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Winkler v. State“too closely resembles a case of buyer's remorse from a guilty verdict to be given much credence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Winkler v. State“generic assertion that a juror would vote the opposite way if given another opportunity,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Winkler v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.