378 So. 2d 1203 - Kendricks v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
December 1989
most recently cited
15 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Shadle v. State · 52 Ala. App. 260 - Barnett v. State · Harnage v. State · 48 Ala. App. 688 - Veith v. State · 44 Ala. App. 157 - Thomas v. Ware
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“". . . The witness had not answered, hence, only a question was in the record. Ordinarily a mistrial is too drastic a penalty in such a posture. "A mistrial only springs into being upon `a manifest necessity * * * or when the ends of justice would otherwise be defeated.' Code 1940, T. 30, Section 100. Thomas v. Ware , 44 Ala. App. 157 , 204 So.2d 501 ; Harnage v. State , 290 Ala. 142 , 274 So.2d 352 ." See also Kendricks v. State , Ala.Cr.App., 378 So.2d 1203 , and authorities therein cited.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Blaylock v. State · McCart v. State“objections must be timely interposed and an adverse ruling had from the trial court before a legal question is preserved for appellate review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.