¶1Affirmed. Pait v. State, 188 So.2d 15 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966); Ersek v. State, 238 So.2d 481 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970); Dixon v. State, 252 So.2d 594 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971); McCrae v. State, 313 So.2d 429 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Robinson v. State, 321 So.2d 121 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Crespo v. State, 339 So.2d 697 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Capo v. State, 363 So.2d 410 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 91 S.Ct. 160, 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970).
378 So. 2d 1283
Miller v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 28, 1979
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1979-12-28
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently May 1985
4 state decisions
Relies on North Carolina v. Alford · Crespo v. State · 313 So. 2d 429 - McCrae v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1979-12-28
View the full empirical analysis of this case →