State v. Mayor’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 1983
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 298 So. 2d 376 - State v. Beamon · 60 So. 2d 734 - State v. Cootner · 81 So. 2d 750 - State v. Bentley · 238 So. 2d 690 - Crowell v. State · State v. Witherspoon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is the defendant — not the state — who is estopped. The defendant is estopped by virtue of his inconsistent positions in first claiming as a basis for acquittal the materiality of the date and then contending on the new information that the actual, different date of the alleged offense is immaterial now, so that whatever the day of the alleged offense he was acquitted of it in the first trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.