Campbell v. Crawford’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 289 So. 2d 129 - Barnett v. Develle · 336 So. 2d 1021 - Parks v. Winnfield Life Insurance Company · Blanchard v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp. · 312 F. Supp. 34 - Kihneman v. Humble Oil & Refining Company · Parks v. Winnfield Life Ins. Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Usually, a cause of action cannot be maintained for redress for these damages because it is fundamental to our system of justice that litigants have full access to the courts to assert claims in good faith. And, as was recognized in Kihneman v. Humble Oil & Refining Company, 312 F.Supp. 34 (E.D.La.1970), `the unsuccessful suitor is not to be held in damages merely because he was mistaken in his belief that he had a proper case.... For it is considered that burdening the unsuccessful plaintiff with such expense would tend to restrict access to the courts to affluent suitors.'"”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Dupre v. Marquis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.