Olcott v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
February 1986
most recently cited
15 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · Wells v. Dungey · 327 So. 2d 18 - State v. Jones · Shead v. State · 237 So. 2d 69 - State v. Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Although a short jail or prison sentence may be imposed as a condition of probation if reasonably related to a rehabilitative purpose, State v. Jones, 327 So.2d 18 (Fla. 1976), it is doubtful whether a lengthy prison term, as here, can stand as a probationary condition when its primary, if not exclusive purpose is to punish the defendant. See Kominsky v. State, 330 So.2d 800 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976). Moreover, it is further doubtful whether a trial court by this device can divest the Parole Board of its exclusive authority to parole a defendant on a prison sentence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Nevertheless, a long prison term seems to be contrary to the spirit of probation and may be employed simply as a device to get around what is conceived to be a liberal policy on early parole. [Footnote omitted.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“`a taste of prison' in order to graphically demonstrate what is likely to happen to him should he violate the terms of that probation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.