Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 378 SO2D 859 - Thompson v. State

Thompson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 1989
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 262 So. 2d 661 - Rinzler v. Carson · Baeumel v. State · In the Matter of Standard Jury Instructions · Quick v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “if there is an exception in the enacting clause, the party pleading must show that his adversary is not within the exception; but, if there be an exception in a subsequent clause, or subsequent statute, that is a matter of defense, and is to be shown by the other party.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.