State v. D.S.’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
April 2023
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Young v. Smith · Davis v. State · State v. Nichols · State v. Dawson · State v. Murphy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Jurisdiction of the subject matter is power lawfully conferred on a court to adjudge matters concerning the general question in controversy. It is power to act on the general cause of action alleged and to determine whether the particular facts call for the exercise of that power. Subject matter jurisdiction does not depend on a correct exercise of that power in any particular case. If the court errs in its decision or proceeds irregularly within its assigned jurisdiction, the remedy is by appeal or direct action in the erring court. If it was within the court's jurisdiction to act upon the subject matter, that action is binding until reversed or set aside.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. A.M. v. State“want of jurisdiction to adjudicate a matter and a determination of whether the jurisdiction should be exercised.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. A.M. v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.