Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 378 U.S. 1 - Malloy v. Hogan

Malloy v. Hogan’s Empirical Analysis

1964

Citation profile

6,092
cited by 6,092 later decisions
335
cited 335 times by the Supreme Court
50
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

1,064 federal appellate · 207 district · 3,702 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6,092 later decisions (335 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2026 · most notably Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera (1966), Chapman v. State of California (1967)

1,064 federal appellate · 207 district · 3,702 state decisions — followed in 50 states

1.4k01964197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gideon v. Wainwright · New York Times Co. v. Sullivan · Mapp v. Ohio · Aguilar v. Texas · Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson

Cited together with Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor · Griffin v. California · Hoffman v. United States · Pointer v. Texas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6,092 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.”
    145 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the right of a person to remain silent unless he chooses to speak in the unfettered exercise of his own will, and to suffer no penalty . . . for such silence.”
    94 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “To sustain the privilege, it need only be evident from the implications of the question, in the setting in which it is asked, that a responsive answer to the question or an explanation of why it cannot be answered might be dangerous because injurious disclosure could result.”
    17 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.