¶1 The judgment below is affirmed. Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U. S. 533. The case is remanded for further proceedings, with respect to relief, consistent with the views stated in our opinions in Reynolds v. Sims and in the other cases relating to state legislative apportionment decided along with Reynolds, should that become necessary. Since this appeal presents no question as to the correctness of the District Court’s later decision upholding the validity of the temporary reapportionment plan enacted by the Iowa General Assembly in February 1964, we do not consider or pass upon this matter.
378 U.S. 565
Hill v. Davis
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 22, 1964
Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1964-06-22
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently December 1971
1 district · 7 state decisions
Key passage — most relied on by later courts
“The case is remanded for further proceedings, with respect to relief, consistent with the views stated in our opinions in Reynolds v. Sims and in the other cases relating to state legislative apportionment decided along with Reynolds, should that become necessary.”
quoted by 1 later decision, including 238 F. Supp. 462 - Davis v. Cameron
Relies on Reynolds v. Sims
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1964-06-22
View the full empirical analysis of this case →