Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 379 F.2d 330 - Wilson v. Anderson

Wilson v. Anderson’s Empirical Analysis

379 F.2d 330 · 1967

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
December 1979
most recently cited

27 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

Appellate journey

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chapman v. State of California · Escobedo v. Illinois · Griffin v. California · Irvin v. Dowd

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(1) ‘[T]here may be some constitutional errors which in the setting of a particular case are so unimportant and insignificant that they may, consistent with the Federal Constitution, be deemed harmless, not resulting in the automatic reversal of the conviction’; (2) Any ‘harmless error’ rule applied to the violation, by a state court, of a provision of the United States Constitution, must be judged by a federal standard; * * * (3) ‘[B]efore a federal constitutional error can be held harmless, the court must be able to declare a belief that it was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.