Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

379 F.2d 554

Docket No. 16204.

Stein's v. Pilling

Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued May 26, 1967. Decided June 6, 1967, Rehearing Denied July 25, 1967.

Third Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1967-06-06

2 counsel of record

Relies on Stein's v. Pilling · Ligori v. United States

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1967-06-06

Mitchell S. Lipschutz, Philadelphia, Pa., Barry M. Weinberg, Camden, N.J., Mitchell S. Lipschutz, Lipschutz & Levy, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellants.

Robert W. Page, Asst. U.S. Atty., Camden, N.J., David M. Satz, Jr., U.S. Atty., Newark, N.J., Robert W. Page, Asst. U.S. Atty., on the brief, for appellee.

Before McLAUGHLIN, KALODNER and FREEDMAN, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

¶1

In the instant case plaintiff appellants sought injunctive relief below against the enforcement of a United States Post Office Department Order, intercepting plaintiffs' mail for fraudulent violation of Title 39 U.S.C.A. 4005.

¶2

The District Court, after extensive hearing, entered an Order granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant-appellee Arlton Pilling, Postmaster at Woodbury, New Jersey, and dismissed the complaint with prejudice.

¶3

On review of the record we find no error. The Order of the District Court will be affirmed for the reasons so well stated by Judge Cohen in his opinion reported at 256 F.Supp. 238 (D.C.N.J.1966).

/379/f2d/554 · .json · Public domain