Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

379 F.2d 555

Docket No. 24058.

Lowe v. Monk

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

June 26, 1967.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1967-06-26

2 counsel of record

Relies on Mullaney v. Anderson · Coleman v. United States · 268 F. Supp. 190 - United States v. Lowe

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1967-06-26

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 1997

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

501967197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Wyman C. Lowe, Atlanta, Ga., pro se.

H. A. Stephens, Jr., Charles E. Walker, Atlanta, Ga., Charles R. Smith, Atlanta, Ga., Smith, Cohen, Ringel, Kohler, Martin & Lowe, Atlanta, Ga., of counsel, for appellee, H. Thaxton Monk. Jr., as Administrator of Estate of Dorothy E. Reece, Deceased.

Before COLEMAN and AINSWORTH, Circuit Judges, and CARSWELL, Cistrict Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

This is an appeal from a summary judgment of the District Court holding that Mrs. Reece, now deceased, was entitled to redeem and did redeem certain property in compliance with 26 U.S.C.A. 6337(b)(2). Finding no error (Cf. the published opinion of the District Court, United States v. Lowe, 268 F.Supp. 190) the Judgment is

¶2

Affirmed.

/379/f2d/555 · .json · Public domain