Mansell v. Carroll’s Empirical Analysis
379 F.2d 682 · 1967
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently April 2018 · most notably Salomon v. Kaiser (In re Kaiser) (1983), Peterson Armstrong v. E Peterson
7 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Japp v. Sapulpa State Bank · Gardner v. Johnson · Rutledge v. Johansen · W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. Groseclose
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The homestead exemption is for the benefit of the family and the protection of the family home. It was never intended as a device to effectuate frauds and a court of equity should not countenance any wrongful use of the homestead right.””
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“pierce the formalities of all of the transactions in question.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.