Schlinsky v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
379 F.2d 735 · 1967
Citation profile
66 federal appellate · 7 district · 11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 95 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2016 · most notably United States v. Marion (1971), Dickey v. Florida (1970)
66 federal appellate · 7 district · 11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 6001 · 26 U.S.C. § 6049 · 26 U.S.C. § 7201 · 26 U.S.C. § 7602
Relies on Anders v. California · Hoffa v. United States · Mallory v. United States · Dennis v. United States · United States v. Ewell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 95 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]n our opinion the purpose of the voir dire is to ascertain disqualifications, not to afford individual analysis in depth to permit a party to choose a jury that fits into some mold that [counsel] believes appropriate for [counsel's] case.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.