Hubbard v. Campbell’s Empirical Analysis
379 F.3d 1245 · 2004
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2024 · most notably Allen v. Ornoski (2006), Moody v. Holman (2018)
4 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Ford v. Wainwright · Nelson v. Campbell Commissioner Alabama Department of Corrections et al. · Stewart v. Martinez-Villareal · In re Medina · Martinez-Villareal v. Stewart
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a final order in a habeas corpus proceeding”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a certificate [of appealability] is unnecessary to permit us to review the district court's order of dismissal”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Moody v. Holman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.