Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 379 F.3d 576 - Nike, Inc. v. McCarthy

Nike, Inc. v. McCarthy’s Empirical Analysis

379 F.3d 576 · 2004

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)

Relies on Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & Industries · Neal v. Shimoda · Walczak v. EPL Prolong, Inc. · Oregon Advocacy Center v. Mink · Gilder v. PGA Tour, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) A noncompetition agreement entered into between an employer and employee is voidable and may not be enforced by a court of this state .unless: a. (A) The employer informs the employee in a written employment offer received by the employee at least two weeks before the first day of the employee’s employment that a noncompetition agreement is required as a condition of employment^]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “`made or carried out in good faith; sincere.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.