Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 379 F.3d 587 - Benecke v. Barnhart

Benecke v. Barnhart’s Empirical Analysis

379 F.3d 587 · 2004

Citation profile

214
cited by 214 later decisions
May 2022
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 49 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 214 later decisions — most recently May 2022 · most notably Lingenfelter v. Astrue (2007), Garrison v. Colvin (2014)

16 federal appellate · 49 district ·

1420200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Ventura · Florida Power & Light Co. v. Lorion · Fair v. Bowen · United States v. Patterson · Sarchet v. Chater

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 214 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the record has been fully developed and further administrative proceedings would serve no useful purpose; (2) the ALJ has failed to provide legally sufficient reasons for rejecting evidence, whether claimant testimony or medical opinion; and (3) if the improperly discredited evidence were credited as true, the ALJ would be required to find the claimant disabled on remand.”
    23 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]o date there are no laboratory tests to confirm the diagnosis.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Allowing the Commissioner to decide the issue again would create an unfair 'heads we win; tails, let's play again' system of disability benefits adjudication.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.