Felix v. Mayle’s Empirical Analysis
379 F.3d 612 · 2004
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2020
4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
Relationships
Relies on Teague v. Lane · Lockyer Attorney General of California v. Andrade · Douglas v. Alabama · United States v. Owens · Pliler Warden v. Ford
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the new claims are based on a different legal theory of which there was no warning in the original pleading.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Williams v. Filson“doctrine to swallow AEDPA's statute of limitations.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Ross v. Williams
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.