Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 379 F.3d 654 - Poulos v. Caesars World, Inc.

Poulos v. Caesars World, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

379 F.3d 654 · 2004

Citation profile

93
cited by 93 later decisions
3
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

27 federal appellate · 10 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 93 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably McLaughlin v. American Tobacco Co. (2008), Melendres v. Arpaio (2012)

27 federal appellate · 10 district · 3 state decisions

480200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1964 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Relies on Bell v. Hood · Burford v. Sun Oil Co. · Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United States · Quackenbush California Insurance Commissioner v. Allstate Insurance Co · Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection Corporation

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 93 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “reliance may be a milepost on the road to causation,”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “`(a) be so intertwined that we must decide the pendent issue in order to review the claims properly raised on interlocutory appeal. . . or (b) resolution of the issue properly raised on interlocutory appeal necessarily resolves the pendent issue.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “It is well settled that, to maintain a civil RICO claim predicated on mail [or wire] fraud, a plaintiff must show that the defendants' alleged misconduct proximately caused the injury.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.