Kaur v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis
379 F.3d 876 · 2004
Citation profile
39 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-Zacarias · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Ventura · Farah v. Ashcroft · Abderrahman Chebchoub v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Alvarez-Santos v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 223 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]n adverse credibility finding is improper when an IJ fails to address a petitioner's explanation for a discrepancy or inconsistency,”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“personal conjecture about the manner in which Indian passport officials carry out their duties”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Singh v. Gonzales · Don v. Gonzales“In any event, this alleged inconsistency does not go to the heart of Sharikyan's claim. In sum, because the IJ'5 adverse credibility finding is not supported by substantial evidence,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sharikyan v. Holder
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.