People v. Irvine’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
35 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently January 2026 · most notably 399 Ill. App. 3d 1150 - People v. Coleman (2010), 401 Ill. App. 3d 199 - People v. Gutman (2010)
35 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · United States v. Salerno · 104 Ill. 2d 504 - People v. Albanese · 209 Ill. 2d 194 - People v. Evans · 212 Ill. 2d 274 - People v. Cunningham
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(1) his counsel’s performance was deficient in that it fell below an objective standard of reasonableness, and (2) the deficient performance prejudiced the defendant in that, but for counsel’s deficient performance, there is a reasonable probability that the result of the proceeding would have been different.” People v. Irvine, 379 Ill. App. 3d 116, 129 , 882 N.E.2d 1124, 1136 (2008).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“persons who have or have had a dating or engagement relationship.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Gray
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.