379 N.J. Super. 118 - Williams v. Kenney’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
2 district · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently December 2021
2 district · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 50 Cal. 3d 205 - Silberg v. Anderson · Erickson v. Marsh & McLennan Co. · Rainier's Dairies v. Raritan Valley Farms, Inc. · Green Acres Trust v. London · Asay v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“draw the line between bona fide litigation activities and a public relations campaign”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The pertinency ... required is not a technical legal relevancy, ... but rather a general frame of reference and relationship to the subject matter of the action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Communications made to newspapers and during press conferences have been almost universally found to be excluded from the protection of absolute privilege.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Jacobs v. Adelson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.