379 N.J. Super. 287 - Wine v. Quezada’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Nappe v. Anschelewitz, Barr, Ansell & Bonello · 262 N.J. Super. 451 - Schmidt v. Schmidt · 359 N.J. Super. 562 - Clarke v. Clarke Ex Rel. Costine · 286 N.J. Super. 408 - Mw v. Rl · 296 N.J. Super. 245 - Sisco v. Sisco
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]t would be inimical to the Act to deny a victim an award of reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred in successfully defending against a challenge to a final restraining order issued by the trial court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“to hold otherwise would create a chilling effect on claims made by bona fide victims who might have the ability to pay.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.