State v. Eberhardt’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
August 1990
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Cermak · State v. Morales · State v. Profit · State v. DeBaere
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When multiple current convictions arise from a single course of conduct and multiple sentences are imposed on the same day pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 609.585 or 609.251, the conviction and sentence for the “earlier” offense should not increase the criminal history score for the “later” offense.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hicks · Walker v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.