Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 379 NW2D 295 - State v. Thompson

State v. Thompson’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
4
states following
October 2022
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently October 2022

19 state decisions

8019851990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ohio v. Roberts · California v. Green · 103 Wash. 2d 165 - State v. Ryan · Huff v. White Motor Corp. · United States v. Quinto

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Before a prior consistent statement will qualify as nonhearsay under the rule, the proponent must demonstrate three things. First, he must show the prior consistent statement is consistent with the witness' in-court testimony. Second, he must establish that the statement is being used to rebut an express or implied charge against the witness of recent fabrication or improper motive or influence. Finally, the proponent must demonstrate that the prior consistent statement was made prior to the time the supposed motive to falsify arose.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A statement is not hearsay if the de-clarant testifies at the trial or hearing and is subject to cross-examination concerning the statement, and the statement is [[Image here]] (2) consistent with his testimony and is offered to rebut an express or implied charge against him of recent fabrication or improper influence or motive[.]”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “the determination of reliability must be made prior to the admission of the hearsay.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.