Krause v. Farber’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently April 2021
2 federal appellate · 12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wild v. Rarig · Abdallah, Inc. v. Martin · Grondahl v. Bulluck · Jewson v. Mayo Clinic · Johnson v. Winthrop Laboratories Division of Sterling Drug, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) whether there is a relationship between physician and patient with regard to the illness; (2) whether the physician is attending and examining the patient; and (3) whether there is something more to be done.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“not allege[d] that there was a regularly scheduled appointment at a future time”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ciardelli v. Rindal
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.