Miller v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““3. A timely application for a case made or transcript at public ex pense must be filed in the trial court a sufficient length of time prior to the expiration of the time within which to appeal to the Court of Criminal Appeals in order to allow the trial court reporters sufficient time in which to prepare said case made. “4. An application for case made, forma pauperis, should be accompanied by supporting proof of poverty.””

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Miller v. District Court of Tulsa County · Williams v. Windham

2. ““Honorable Kirksey Nix Presiding Judge, Court of Criminal Appeals State of Oklahoma Oklahoma 5, Oklahoma Re: Glenn J. Miller, #19602 Dear Judge Nix: Replying to your letter of December 27, 1962, regarding above mentioned subject. I have before me the file in that case, and it reflects the following: Judgment and Sentence entered on October 18, 1962, sentenced the defendant to 15 years for Robbery With Firearms After Former Conviction of a Felony on jury verdict. Motion for new trial was filed on the same date and was overruled and defendant was granted an extention of time for the purpose of making and serving a casemade. On December 17, defendant, through his counsel, obtained an order granting 30 additional days to make and serve a casemade, this 30 days beyond the initial time .allowed. This case was tried before Judge Leslie Webb, Supernumerary Judge. I contacted Judge Webb by telephone today, and he advised me that no request has been presented to him for a case-made at public expense. The defendant was represented at his jury trial by Amos Nichols, a member of the Tulsa Bar, who represented to me at the time I assigned the case to Judge Webb for trial that Miller was a long-time personal friend of his. Mr. Earl Trues-dell, an attorney of the Tulsa Bar, appeared with and for the defendant at the time of sentencing, filed a motion for new trial, and obtained the initial order for time to make and serve a casemade, and also obtained the or der extending time on December 17”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Miller v. State