379 Pa. Super. 515 - Commonwealth v. Ziegler’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Commonwealth v. Tuladziecki · Poola v. UNEMP. COMP. BD. OF REVIEW · 362 Pa. Super. 176 - Commonwealth v. Westcott · 341 Pa. Super. 261 - Commonwealth v. White · Commonwealth v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) by forcible compulsion; (2) by threat of forcible compulsion that would prevent resistance by a person of reasonable resolution; (3) who is unconscious; (4) who is so mentally deranged or deficient that such person is incapable of consent; or (5) who is less than 16 years of age.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.