Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 379 SO2D 1336 - State v. Sonnier

State v. Sonnier’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

129
cited by 129 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
7
states following
November 2013
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 120 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 129 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2013 · most notably 445 So. 2d 1198 - State v. Wright (1984), State v. Smith (1983)

6 federal appellate · 120 state decisions

9501980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chapman v. State of California · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Gregg v. Georgia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 129 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A change of venue shall be granted when the applicant proves that by reason of prejudice existing in the public mind or because of undue influence, or that for any other reason, a fair and impartial trial cannot be obtained in the parish where the prosecution is pending. In deciding whether to grant a change of venue the court shall consider whether the prejudice, the influence, or the other reasons are such that they will affect the answers of jurors on the voir dire examination or the testimony of witnesses at the trial.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “Every sentence of death shall be reviewed by this court to determine if it is excessive. In determining whether the sentence is excessive the court shall determine:”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “especially heinous, atrocious or cruel manner”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.